---
trigger: always_on
---
# Microservices Development Process
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Creating a new microservice from scratch
- Migrating or refactoring an existing service
- Planning service implementation with multiple phases
- Ensuring comprehensive coverage of all development aspects
- Need structured approach to service development
## Development Process Overview
The microservices development process follows these phases:
1. **Planning & Impact Analysis** - Define scope, impact, dependencies
2. **Foundation Setup** - Service structure, configs, infrastructure
3. **Core Implementation** - Business logic, APIs, data layer
4. **Integration** - Routes, middleware, external services
5. **Testing** - Unit, integration, E2E tests
6. **Documentation** - API docs, README, guides
7. **Cleanup & Verification** - Remove temporary files, verify completeness
8. **Deployment** - Staging deployment, production deployment
### Process Flow Diagram
```mermaid
graph TD
Start([Start: New Service Requirements]) --> Phase1[Phase 1: Planning & Impact Analysis]
Phase1 --> ImpactCheck{Impact Analysis
Complete?}
ImpactCheck -->|No| Phase1
ImpactCheck -->|Yes| Phase2[Phase 2: Foundation Setup]
Phase2 --> FoundationCheck{Service Starts
& Health Check Passes?}
FoundationCheck -->|No| Phase2
FoundationCheck -->|Yes| Phase3[Phase 3: Core Implementation]
Phase3 --> ImplementationCheck{Business Logic
Implemented?}
ImplementationCheck -->|No| Phase3
ImplementationCheck -->|Yes| Phase4[Phase 4: Integration]
Phase4 --> IntegrationCheck{Routes & Middleware
Working?}
IntegrationCheck -->|No| Phase4
IntegrationCheck -->|Yes| Phase5[Phase 5: Testing]
Phase5 --> TestCheck{Tests Pass
& Coverage Met?}
TestCheck -->|No| Phase5
TestCheck -->|Yes| Phase6[Phase 6: Documentation]
Phase6 --> DocCheck{Docs
Complete?}
DocCheck -->|No| Phase6
DocCheck -->|Yes| Phase7[Phase 7: Cleanup & Verification]
Phase7 --> VerificationCheck{All Checks
Pass?}
VerificationCheck -->|No| Phase7
VerificationCheck -->|Yes| Phase8[Phase 8: Deployment]
Phase8 --> DeployCheck{Staging
Deployed?}
DeployCheck -->|No| Phase8
DeployCheck -->|Yes| Production{Deploy to
Production?}
Production -->|Yes| ProdDeploy[Production Deployment]
Production -->|No| Complete([Complete])
ProdDeploy --> Complete
style Phase1 fill:#e1f5ff
style Phase2 fill:#fff4e1
style Phase3 fill:#f0e1ff
style Phase4 fill:#e1ffe1
style Phase5 fill:#ffe1e1
style Phase6 fill:#e1ffff
style Phase7 fill:#fff0e1
style Phase8 fill:#ffe1f5
style Complete fill:#d4edda
```
### Detailed Phase Flow
```mermaid
graph LR
subgraph Planning["Phase 1: Planning"]
P1A[Define Scope] --> P1B[Impact Analysis]
P1B --> P1C[Dependencies Map]
P1C --> P1D[Acceptance Criteria]
end
subgraph Foundation["Phase 2: Foundation"]
F2A[Copy Template] --> F2B[Configure Package]
F2B --> F2C[Setup Database]
F2C --> F2D[Configure Docker]
F2D --> F2E[Setup Traefik]
end
subgraph Implementation["Phase 3: Implementation"]
I3A[DTOs] --> I3B[Repository]
I3B --> I3C[Service]
I3C --> I3D[Controller]
I3D --> I3E[Module]
end
subgraph Integration["Phase 4: Integration"]
IN4A[Register Routes] --> IN4B[Setup Middleware]
IN4B --> IN4C[External Services]
IN4C --> IN4D[Health Checks]
end
subgraph Testing["Phase 5: Testing"]
T5A[Unit Tests] --> T5B[Integration Tests]
T5B --> T5C[E2E Tests]
T5C --> T5D[Coverage Check]
end
subgraph Documentation["Phase 6: Documentation"]
D6A[README] --> D6B[API Docs]
D6B --> D6C[Architecture Docs]
end
subgraph Cleanup["Phase 7: Cleanup"]
C7A[Remove Temp Files] --> C7B[Update References]
C7B --> C7C[Verify Everything]
end
subgraph Deployment["Phase 8: Deployment"]
DEP8A[Staging] --> DEP8B[Verification]
DEP8B --> DEP8C[Production]
end
Planning --> Foundation
Foundation --> Implementation
Implementation --> Integration
Integration --> Testing
Testing --> Documentation
Documentation --> Cleanup
Cleanup --> Deployment
style Planning fill:#e1f5ff
style Foundation fill:#fff4e1
style Implementation fill:#f0e1ff
style Integration fill:#e1ffe1
style Testing fill:#ffe1e1
style Documentation fill:#e1ffff
style Cleanup fill:#fff0e1
style Deployment fill:#ffe1f5
```
## Phase 1: Planning & Impact Analysis
### Scope Definition
Define clearly:
- **Service Purpose**: What business capability does it provide?
- **API Surface**: What endpoints are needed?
- **Data Models**: What data structures are required?
- **Dependencies**: What services/packages does it depend on?
- **Breaking Changes**: Any backward compatibility concerns?
### Impact Analysis Checklist
Before starting implementation, identify all affected areas:
**Files to Create:**
- [ ] Service directory: `services/service-name/`
- [ ] Prisma schema: `services/service-name/prisma/schema.prisma`
- [ ] Dockerfile: `services/service-name/Dockerfile`
- [ ] Service README: `services/service-name/README.md`
**Files to Update:**
- [ ] Root `package.json` workspace config
- [ ] `deployments/local/docker-compose.yml` - Add service
- [ ] `infra/traefik/dynamic/routes.yml` - Add routes
- [ ] `.github/workflows/ci-*.yml` - Add CI workflow (if needed)
- [ ] Documentation: `docs/en/guides/`, `docs/vi/guides/`
- [ ] Scripts: `scripts/db/*.sh`, `scripts/dev/*.sh` (if service-specific)
**Infrastructure Changes:**
- [ ] Database: New schema/tables
- [ ] Redis: New cache keys/patterns (if needed)
- [ ] Traefik: New routes and services
- [ ] Observability: New service metrics/traces
**Dependencies:**
- [ ] External: Database, Redis, third-party APIs
- [ ] Internal: Shared packages (@goodgo/logger, @goodgo/types, etc.)
- [ ] Other Services: List dependent services
## Phase 2: Foundation Setup
### Service Structure Creation
**Template Usage:**
```bash
cp -r services/_template services/new-service-name
cd services/new-service-name
# Update package.json name to @goodgo/new-service-name
```
**Required Files:**
- Service structure from template
- `package.json` with correct name and dependencies
- `src/config/app.config.ts` - Configuration with Zod validation
- `.env.example` - Environment variables template
- `prisma/schema.prisma` - Database schema
- `Dockerfile` - Container configuration
- `jest.config.ts` - Test configuration
### Database Setup
```bash
# Create initial migration
cd services/service-name
pnpm prisma migrate dev --name init
pnpm prisma generate
```
### Docker & Infrastructure
**Docker Compose Integration:**
Add service to `deployments/local/docker-compose.yml` with:
- Build context and dockerfile
- Environment variables
- Traefik labels for routing
- Health check configuration
**Traefik Routes:**
Update `infra/traefik/dynamic/routes.yml` with:
- Router rules (PathPrefix)
- Service configuration
- Middleware chain (CORS, rate-limit, auth)
### Acceptance Criteria for Phase 2
- [ ] Service directory created from template
- [ ] `package.json` configured correctly
- [ ] Environment variables defined
- [ ] Prisma schema created and migration run
- [ ] Service starts: `pnpm dev` (health check passes)
- [ ] Docker build succeeds
- [ ] Service accessible via Traefik
- [ ] No TypeScript errors: `pnpm typecheck`
## Phase 3: Core Implementation
### Module Structure
Each feature module follows this pattern:
```
modules/feature-name/
├── feature.controller.ts # HTTP handlers
├── feature.service.ts # Business logic
├── feature.repository.ts # Data access
├── feature.dto.ts # Validation schemas (Zod)
├── feature.module.ts # Module registration
└── index.ts # Public exports
```
### Implementation Flow
```mermaid
graph TD
Start[Start Implementation] --> DTOs[1. Create DTOs
Zod Validation Schemas]
DTOs --> Repo[2. Create Repository
Prisma Data Access]
Repo --> Service[3. Create Service
Business Logic]
Service --> Controller[4. Create Controller
HTTP Handlers]
Controller --> Module[5. Create Module
Wire Up Components]
Module --> Test[Manual Testing]
Test --> Pass{Tests Pass?}
Pass -->|No| Repo
Pass -->|Yes| Next[Next Feature Module]
style DTOs fill:#e1f5ff
style Repo fill:#fff4e1
style Service fill:#f0e1ff
style Controller fill:#e1ffe1
style Module fill:#ffe1e1
```
### Implementation Order
1. **DTOs** - Zod schemas for request/response validation
2. **Repository** - Prisma-based data access, CRUD operations
3. **Service** - Business logic, error handling, validation
4. **Controller** - HTTP request handling, standardized responses
5. **Module** - Wire up components, export router
### Code Patterns
**Repository:** Extend base Repository, use Prisma client for data access
**Service:** Inject repository, implement business logic, use logger
**Controller:** Handle HTTP requests, validate with DTOs, call services
**Module:** Wire up dependencies, export router
### Acceptance Criteria for Phase 3
- [ ] All DTOs defined with Zod validation
- [ ] Repository methods implemented
- [ ] Service business logic implemented
- [ ] Controllers handle requests correctly
- [ ] Modules configured properly
- [ ] No TypeScript errors
- [ ] Manual API testing successful
## Phase 4: Integration
### Route Registration
Update `src/routes/index.ts`:
- Import feature modules
- Create router instances
- Register routes with path prefixes
- Mount to main app with `/api/v1/service-name` prefix
### Middleware Setup
**Required Middlewares (in order):**
1. Correlation middleware
2. Logging middleware
3. Metrics middleware
4. CORS middleware
5. Rate limiting middleware
6. Authentication middleware (if needed)
7. Error middleware (always last)
### External Service Integration
- HTTP clients: Use `@goodgo/http-client` for external APIs
- Redis caching: Implement cache patterns for frequently accessed data
- Error handling: Handle external service failures gracefully
### Acceptance Criteria for Phase 4
- [ ] All routes registered and accessible
- [ ] Middlewares applied in correct order
- [ ] Error handling works for all scenarios
- [ ] External services integrated (if any)
- [ ] Caching implemented (if needed)
- [ ] Health check endpoint works: `/health`
## Phase 5: Testing
### Test Structure
**Unit Tests:** Next to source files (`*.test.ts`), mock all dependencies
**Integration Tests:** `src/__tests__/`, test component interactions
**E2E Tests:** `src/__tests__/*.e2e.ts`, test full API workflows
### Test Coverage Targets
- Minimum: 70% coverage (branches, functions, lines, statements)
- Critical paths: 90%+ coverage
- Repositories: 80%+ coverage
- Services: 80%+ coverage
- Controllers: 70%+ coverage