9.2 KiB
[Architecture Name]
Brief English description of this architectural component or system
Overview Diagram
graph TD
A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
B --> C[Component C]
C --> D[Component D]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style B fill:#fff4e1
style C fill:#f0e1ff
style D fill:#e1ffe1
Architecture Description
Detailed English explanation of the architecture, including:
- Purpose and goals
- Key components
- Design decisions
- Technology choices
- Trade-offs and considerations
System Context
C4Context
title System Context Diagram for GoodGo Microservices Platform
Person(user, "End User", "Platform users")
Person(admin, "Administrator", "System administrators")
System_Boundary(platform, "GoodGo Platform") {
System(gateway, "Traefik Gateway", "API Gateway, routing, load balancing")
System(services, "Microservices", "IAM, Storage, Chat, Membership, etc.")
System(rabbitmq, "RabbitMQ", "Message broker for async events")
}
System_Ext(neon, "Neon PostgreSQL", "Serverless database")
System_Ext(redis, "Redis", "Cache and session store")
System_Ext(minio, "MinIO/Aliyun OSS", "Object storage")
System_Ext(monitoring, "Observability Stack", "Prometheus + Grafana + Loki + Jaeger")
Rel(user, gateway, "Uses", "HTTPS")
Rel(admin, gateway, "Manages", "HTTPS")
Rel(gateway, services, "Routes to", "HTTP")
Rel(services, neon, "Stores data", "PostgreSQL")
Rel(services, redis, "Caches data", "Redis Protocol")
Rel(services, rabbitmq, "Pub/Sub events", "AMQP")
Rel(services, minio, "Stores files", "S3 API")
Rel(services, monitoring, "Sends telemetry", "HTTP/gRPC")
The GoodGo Platform uses microservices architecture where all client requests go through Traefik API Gateway. Services communicate synchronously via REST/HTTP and asynchronously via RabbitMQ events. Each service has its own database schema in Neon PostgreSQL and uses Redis for caching.
Components
Component A
Description of Component A, its responsibilities, and how it fits into the overall architecture.
Key Features:
- Feature 1
- Feature 2
- Feature 3
Technologies Used:
- Technology 1
- Technology 2
Code Reference:
// Example code showing how this component is implemented
import { ComponentA } from './component-a';
const componentA = new ComponentA({
config: appConfig,
});
File Location: component-a.ts
Real-World Example: Storage Service
File storage management service supporting multiple cloud providers (MinIO, Aliyun OSS).
Key Features:
- Multi-provider pattern (MinIO/Aliyun OSS)
- Pre-signed URL generation for secure uploads/downloads
- User quota management
- File sharing with time-limited tokens
- Direct client upload pattern
Technologies Used:
- .NET 10, Entity Framework Core
- MinIO Client, Aliyun OSS SDK
- Redis (caching)
- PostgreSQL (Neon)
Architecture Pattern:
// Provider abstraction
public interface IStorageProvider
{
Task<string> UploadFileAsync(Stream fileStream, string fileName, CancellationToken ct);
Task<string> GeneratePresignedUrlAsync(string objectKey, int expiryMinutes, CancellationToken ct);
}
// Concrete implementations
public class MinioStorageProvider : IStorageProvider { }
public class AliyunOssStorageProvider : IStorageProvider { }
// Factory pattern for provider selection
public class StorageProviderFactory
{
public IStorageProvider CreateProvider(string providerName) { }
}
File Location: services/storage-service-net/
Real-World Example: IAM Service
Identity and Access Management service handling authentication, authorization, and RBAC.
Key Features:
- JWT authentication (RS256)
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
- MFA support (TOTP)
- Session management
- Permission caching
Technologies Used:
- .NET 10, Duende IdentityServer
- Entity Framework Core
- Redis (caching)
- PostgreSQL (Neon)
File Location: services/iam-service-net/
Data Flow
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant Service
participant Database
Client->>API: Request
API->>Service: Process
Service->>Database: Query
Database-->>Service: Result
Service-->>API: Response
API-->>Client: JSON
Detailed explanation of the data flow:
- Step 1: Description
- Step 2: Description
- Step 3: Description
Database Architecture
erDiagram
Entity1 ||--o{ Entity2 : has
Entity2 ||--o{ Entity3 : contains
Entity1 {
string id PK
string name
datetime createdAt
}
Entity2 {
string id PK
string entity1Id FK
string description
}
Database schema description, relationships, and design decisions.
Design Decisions
Decision 1: [Decision Title]
Context: Why this decision was needed
Decision: What was decided
Consequences: Impact of the decision (positive and negative)
Alternatives Considered: Other options that were evaluated
Performance Characteristics
Description of performance expectations and optimizations based on GoodGo Platform standards.
| Metric | Target | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| API Response Time (P95) | < 200ms | Excluding external API calls |
| API Response Time (P99) | < 500ms | Peak load scenarios |
| Throughput | 1000 req/s | Per service instance |
| Database Query Time (P95) | < 50ms | Simple queries with indexes |
| Cache Hit Rate (L1) | > 40% | In-memory cache |
| Cache Hit Rate (L2) | > 80% | Redis cache |
| Service Availability | > 99.9% | Monthly uptime target |
| Error Rate | < 1% | 4xx + 5xx errors |
Optimization Strategies:
- Multi-layer caching: L1 (Memory) + L2 (Redis)
- Connection pooling: For PostgreSQL connections
- Pagination: Max 100 items per page for list endpoints
- Database indexes: On frequently queried fields
- Async events: Fire-and-forget with RabbitMQ
- CDN: For static assets (Next.js)
Security Considerations
Security features, authentication, authorization, data protection
- Security feature 1
- Security feature 2
Deployment
How this architecture is deployed and scaled in GoodGo Platform.
Traefik API Gateway Routing
# docker-compose.yml
services:
storage-service-net:
labels:
- "traefik.enable=true"
- "traefik.http.routers.storage-service.rule=PathPrefix(`/api/v1/storage`)"
- "traefik.http.services.storage-service.loadbalancer.server.port=8080"
- "traefik.http.routers.storage-service.middlewares=strip-prefix@docker"
Kubernetes Deployment
graph LR
LB[Load Balancer] --> Traefik[Traefik Gateway<br/>2-3 replicas]
Traefik --> A[Service A<br/>2-10 replicas HPA]
Traefik --> B[Service B<br/>2-10 replicas HPA]
Traefik --> C[Service C<br/>2-10 replicas HPA]
A --> DB[(Neon PostgreSQL<br/>Serverless)]
B --> DB
C --> DB
A --> Cache[(Redis Cluster<br/>3 nodes)]
B --> Cache
C --> Cache
style LB fill:#1565c0,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style Traefik fill:#0f4c81,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style A fill:#283593,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style B fill:#4527a0,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style C fill:#4527a0,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style DB fill:#5e35b1,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style Cache fill:#ef6c00,stroke:#fff,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
Resource Allocation:
| Service | Requests | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Microservices | 256Mi RAM, 250m CPU | 512Mi RAM, 500m CPU |
| Traefik | 512Mi RAM, 500m CPU | 1Gi RAM, 1000m CPU |
| Redis | 2Gi RAM, 1 CPU | 4Gi RAM, 2 CPU |
Monitoring & Observability
How to monitor this architecture, key metrics, alerts
Key Metrics:
- Metric 1
- Metric 2
Health Checks:
/health/live- Liveness probe/health/ready- Readiness probe
Related Documentation
Architecture Documents
- System Design - Overall platform architecture
- Microservices Communication - Service communication patterns
- Caching Architecture - Redis caching strategies
- Event-Driven Architecture - RabbitMQ event patterns
Skills Reference
- CQRS with MediatR - CQRS pattern
- Repository Pattern - EF Core repository
- Domain-Driven Design - DDD patterns
Guides
- Local Development - Setup dev environment
- Deployment - Kubernetes deployment
References
- External Resource 1 - Description
- External Resource 2 - Description
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Authors: VelikHo (hongochai10@icloud.com)
Reviewers: Reviewer Names