Files
goodgo-platform/docs/audits/MCP_MODULE_EXPLORATION.md
Ho Ngoc Hai 642b593884 docs: move remaining analysis docs to docs/audits/
Move MCP module exploration, quick reference, and inquiries exploration
documents to the centralized audit directory.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-04-11 01:38:14 +07:00

674 lines
20 KiB
Markdown

# MCP Module Exploration - GoodGo Platform
## 1. MODULE STRUCTURE & SOURCE FILES
### Directory Structure
```
apps/api/src/modules/mcp/
├── index.ts
├── mcp.module.ts
└── presentation/
├── mcp-transport.controller.ts
└── __tests__/
└── mcp-transport.controller.spec.ts
```
### All Source Files (4 files)
#### 1. **apps/api/src/modules/mcp/index.ts**
- **Type**: Module entry point (exports)
- **Purpose**: Exports the McpIntegrationModule
- **Exports**: `{ McpIntegrationModule }`
#### 2. **apps/api/src/modules/mcp/mcp.module.ts**
- **Type**: NestJS Module configuration (22 lines)
- **Key Class**: `McpIntegrationModule implements OnModuleInit`
- **Responsibility**:
- Sets up MCP core module with configuration
- Initializes TypesenseClient for MCP registry
- Logs initialized server names on module init
- **Dependencies Injected**:
- `TypesenseClientService` (from SearchModule)
- `McpRegistryService` (from @goodgo/mcp-servers)
- `LoggerService` (from SharedModule)
- **Imports**:
- `SearchModule`
- `AuthModule`
- `McpCoreModule.forRoot()` with config
- **Controllers**: McpTransportController
- **Lifecycle**: Implements `onModuleInit()`
#### 3. **apps/api/src/modules/mcp/presentation/mcp-transport.controller.ts**
- **Type**: NestJS Controller (102 lines)
- **Key Class**: `McpTransportController`
- **Responsibility**: HTTP transport layer for MCP SSE connections
- **Decorators Applied**:
- `@ApiTags('mcp')`
- `@ApiBearerAuth('JWT')`
- `@Controller('mcp')`
- `@UseGuards(JwtAuthGuard)` - protects all endpoints
- **Properties**:
- `transports: Map<string, SSEServerTransport>` - active session management
- **Injected Dependencies**:
- `registry: McpRegistryService`
**Endpoints:**
1. **GET /mcp/servers** (line 27-34)
- Summary: List available MCP servers
- Throttle: 30 requests per 60s
- Returns: `{ servers: string[] }`
- Status: 200 (success), 401 (unauthorized)
2. **GET /mcp/:serverName/sse** (line 36-68)
- Summary: Open SSE connection to MCP server
- Throttle: 5 requests per 60s (stricter)
- Params: `serverName`
- Returns: SSE stream
- Response Handling:
- Creates `SSEServerTransport` instance
- Stores in map with `sessionId`
- Connects to server via `server.connect(transport)`
- Cleans up on request close
- Status: 200 (stream), 404 (server not found), 401 (unauthorized)
3. **POST /mcp/:serverName/messages** (line 70-102)
- Summary: Send message to MCP server session
- Throttle: 30 requests per 60s
- Params: `serverName`
- Query: `sessionId` (required)
- Body: Message data passed to transport
- Response Handling:
- Validates sessionId exists
- Delegates to `transport.handlePostMessage(req, res)`
- Status: 200 (success), 400 (missing sessionId), 404 (session not found), 401 (unauthorized)
---
## 2. TEST FILES
### Total Test Files: 1
#### **apps/api/src/modules/mcp/presentation/__tests__/mcp-transport.controller.spec.ts** (174 lines)
- **Testing Framework**: Vitest
- **Subject**: `McpTransportController`
- **Test Structure**: Describe blocks + beforeEach setup
**Test Suites (4 describe blocks):**
1. **security decorators** (4 tests)
- Verifies JwtAuthGuard is applied
- Checks Throttle metadata on endpoints
- Validates throttle limits (30, 5, 30)
2. **listServers** (2 tests)
- Returns server list from registry
- Handles empty server list
3. **handleSse** (3 tests)
- Throws NOT_FOUND when server doesn't exist
- Creates transport and connects to server
- Cleans up on connection close (transport removal)
4. **handleMessage** (2 tests)
- Throws BAD_REQUEST when sessionId missing
- Throws NOT_FOUND when session doesn't exist
**Mocking Patterns Used:**
- `vi.mock()` for external modules (SSEServerTransport)
- `vi.fn()` for service method mocks
- `mockReturnValue()`, `mockResolvedValue()`, `mockRejectValue()`
- Manual mock objects for requests/responses
- Reflection API for metadata checks (`Reflect.getMetadata()`)
---
## 3. DDD LAYER STRUCTURE
**Current Status**: MCP module has a **SIMPLIFIED structure** (NOT full DDD yet):
### What EXISTS:
- **Presentation Layer** ✅
- `presentation/mcp-transport.controller.ts`
- `presentation/__tests__/mcp-transport.controller.spec.ts`
- HTTP endpoint definitions
- Guard decorators (auth)
- Throttle decorators
- Swagger decorators
### What DOES NOT EXIST (yet):
- **Domain Layer** ❌
- No `domain/` directory
- No entities, value objects, or domain events
- No domain business logic
- **Application Layer** ❌
- No `application/` directory
- No commands/handlers (CQRS pattern not used here)
- No queries
- No DTOs
- **Infrastructure Layer** ❌
- No `infrastructure/` directory
- No repositories
- No external service adapters
- No database access
### Architecture Notes:
- The MCP module acts as an **integration wrapper**
- Delegates to `@goodgo/mcp-servers` library (external dependency)
- Simple **presentation-only controller** approach
- Focuses on HTTP transport mechanism (SSE connections)
- Session management via in-memory Map
---
## 4. KEY CLASSES/HANDLERS NEEDING TESTS
### Current Implementation:
1. **McpIntegrationModule** (mcp.module.ts)
- **Status**: Partially tested (initialization logic)
- **Methods needing tests**:
- `constructor()` - dependency injection
- `onModuleInit()` - initialization flow
- **Test focus**: Module setup, service integration, logging
2. **McpTransportController** (mcp-transport.controller.ts)
- **Status**: Well tested ✅ (174 lines of tests)
- **Methods tested**:
- `listServers()` - returns available servers
- `handleSse()` - establishes SSE connection
- `handleMessage()` - routes messages to session
- **Test coverage**: Happy path + error cases + security decorators
---
## 5. TESTING PATTERNS FROM OTHER MODULES
### Pattern 1: Auth Module - Handler Testing (Simple)
**File**: `apps/api/src/modules/auth/application/__tests__/login-user.handler.spec.ts`
```typescript
// KEY PATTERNS:
// 1. No explicit imports from vitest (globals enabled)
// 2. beforeEach: Create handler with mocked dependencies
// 3. vi.fn() for service mocks
// 4. mockResolvedValue() for async returns
// 5. expect().toHaveBeenCalledWith() for verification
// 6. Simple test structure for handlers
describe('LoginUserHandler', () => {
let handler: LoginUserHandler;
let mockTokenService: { generateTokenPair: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> };
const tokenPair = {
accessToken: 'access-jwt',
refreshToken: 'family.refresh-hex',
expiresIn: 900,
};
beforeEach(() => {
mockTokenService = { generateTokenPair: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(tokenPair) };
handler = new LoginUserHandler(mockTokenService as any);
});
it('generates token pair with correct payload', async () => {
const command = new LoginUserCommand('user-1', '0912345678', 'BUYER');
const result = await handler.execute(command);
expect(result).toEqual(tokenPair);
expect(mockTokenService.generateTokenPair).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
sub: 'user-1',
phone: '0912345678',
role: 'BUYER',
});
});
});
```
**Key Takeaways**:
- ✅ Minimal setup, direct handler instantiation
- ✅ Command objects for test input
- ✅ Simple mock with typed object
- ✅ Focus on behavior verification
- ✅ Uses `as any` for type casting
### Pattern 2: Payments Module - Complex Handler Testing (Advanced)
**File**: `apps/api/src/modules/payments/application/__tests__/create-payment.handler.spec.ts`
```typescript
// KEY PATTERNS:
// 1. Multiple mocked dependencies (repo, factory, gateway, event bus)
// 2. Complex mock setup with multiple methods
// 3. Tests for idempotency handling
// 4. Error case validation
// 5. Event publishing verification
describe('CreatePaymentHandler', () => {
let handler: CreatePaymentHandler;
let mockPaymentRepo: { [K in keyof IPaymentRepository]: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> };
let mockGatewayFactory: { getGateway: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> };
let mockGateway: {
createPaymentUrl: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>;
verifyCallback: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>;
refund: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>;
};
let mockEventBus: { publish: ReturnType<typeof vi.fn> };
beforeEach(() => {
mockPaymentRepo = {
findById: vi.fn(),
findByProviderTxId: vi.fn(),
findByIdempotencyKey: vi.fn(),
findByUserId: vi.fn(),
save: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
update: vi.fn(),
updateIfStatus: vi.fn(),
};
mockGateway = {
createPaymentUrl: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
paymentUrl: 'https://vnpay.vn/pay/123',
providerTxId: 'vnpay-tx-1',
}),
verifyCallback: vi.fn(),
refund: vi.fn(),
};
mockGatewayFactory = {
getGateway: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(mockGateway),
};
mockEventBus = { publish: vi.fn() };
const mockLogger = { log: vi.fn(), warn: vi.fn(), error: vi.fn(), debug: vi.fn(), verbose: vi.fn() };
handler = new CreatePaymentHandler(
mockPaymentRepo as any,
mockGatewayFactory as any,
mockEventBus as any,
mockLogger as any,
);
});
it('creates payment successfully', async () => {
mockPaymentRepo.findByIdempotencyKey.mockResolvedValue(null);
const command = new CreatePaymentCommand(
'user-1', 'VNPAY', 'SUBSCRIPTION', 500_000n,
'Thanh toán gói Pro', 'https://goodgo.vn/return', '127.0.0.1',
undefined, 'idem-key-1',
);
const result = await handler.execute(command);
expect(result.paymentId).toBeDefined();
expect(result.paymentUrl).toBe('https://vnpay.vn/pay/123');
expect(result.providerTxId).toBe('vnpay-tx-1');
expect(mockPaymentRepo.save).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockEventBus.publish).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockGatewayFactory.getGateway).toHaveBeenCalledWith('VNPAY');
});
it('throws ConflictException for duplicate idempotency key (pending)', async () => {
mockPaymentRepo.findByIdempotencyKey.mockResolvedValue({ status: 'PENDING' });
const command = new CreatePaymentCommand(
'user-1', 'VNPAY', 'SUBSCRIPTION', 500_000n,
'desc', 'https://goodgo.vn/return', '127.0.0.1',
undefined, 'existing-key',
);
await expect(handler.execute(command)).rejects.toThrow(/idempotency/);
});
});
```
**Key Takeaways**:
- ✅ Complex multi-dependency mocking
- ✅ Mapped type for repository mocks `[K in keyof IPaymentRepository]`
- ✅ Individual method mocks for each dependency
- ✅ Tests for business rules (idempotency)
- ✅ Error case testing with regex matching
- ✅ Logger mock included
- ✅ Verify multiple calls and interactions
### Pattern 3: Domain Entity Testing (DDD Style)
**File**: `apps/api/src/modules/payments/domain/__tests__/payment.entity.spec.ts`
```typescript
// KEY PATTERNS:
// 1. Explicit vitest imports at the top
// 2. Complex entity with state transitions
// 3. Tests for domain events
// 4. Tests for value objects
// 5. Tests for error handling (Result types)
// 6. Helper factory function for test setup
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { PaymentEntity } from '../entities/payment.entity';
import { PaymentCompletedEvent } from '../events/payment-completed.event';
import { PaymentCreatedEvent } from '../events/payment-created.event';
import { PaymentFailedEvent } from '../events/payment-failed.event';
import { PaymentRefundedEvent } from '../events/payment-refunded.event';
import { Money } from '../value-objects/money.vo';
describe('PaymentEntity', () => {
const createPayment = (status?: string) => {
const money = Money.create(500_000n).unwrap();
const payment = PaymentEntity.createNew(
'pay-1',
'user-1',
'VNPAY',
'LISTING_FEE',
money,
'txn-1',
'idem-key-1',
);
if (status === 'PROCESSING') {
payment.markProcessing('vnp-txn-123');
}
if (status === 'COMPLETED') {
payment.markProcessing('vnp-txn-123');
payment.clearDomainEvents();
payment.markCompleted({ responseCode: '00' });
}
return payment;
};
it('should create a new payment with domain events', () => {
const money = Money.create(500_000n).unwrap();
const payment = PaymentEntity.createNew(
'pay-1',
'user-1',
'VNPAY',
'LISTING_FEE',
money,
'txn-1',
);
expect(payment.id).toBe('pay-1');
expect(payment.status).toBe('PENDING');
const events = payment.domainEvents;
expect(events).toHaveLength(1);
expect(events[0]).toBeInstanceOf(PaymentCreatedEvent);
});
it('should mark completed payment as refunded and emit event', () => {
const payment = createPayment('COMPLETED');
payment.clearDomainEvents();
const result = payment.markRefunded();
expect(result.isOk).toBe(true);
expect(payment.status).toBe('REFUNDED');
const events = payment.domainEvents;
expect(events).toHaveLength(1);
expect(events[0]).toBeInstanceOf(PaymentRefundedEvent);
});
it('should not refund a non-completed payment', () => {
const payment = createPayment();
const result = payment.markRefunded();
expect(result.isErr).toBe(true);
expect(result.unwrapErr().message).toContain('hoàn tiền');
});
});
```
**Key Takeaways**:
- ✅ Explicit vitest imports (explicit over implicit)
- ✅ Helper factory method for complex setup
- ✅ Tests for entity behavior (state transitions)
- ✅ Tests for domain events
- ✅ Tests for error handling (Result pattern)
- ✅ No mocking - tests real entity logic
- ✅ Value object usage (Money.create().unwrap())
- ✅ Domain event verification
### Pattern 4: Infrastructure Service Testing (Crypto/External)
**File**: `apps/api/src/modules/payments/infrastructure/__tests__/zalopay.service.spec.ts`
```typescript
// KEY PATTERNS:
// 1. Explicit vitest imports
// 2. External service simulation (payment gateway)
// 3. Crypto/HMAC signature testing
// 4. Helper function to build test data
// 5. Mocking ConfigService
// 6. Tests for security (tamper detection)
import * as crypto from 'crypto';
import { type ConfigService } from '@nestjs/config';
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest';
import { ZalopayService } from '../services/zalopay.service';
describe('ZalopayService', () => {
let service: ZalopayService;
const key2 = 'TESTKEY2ABCDEF1234567890ABCDEF12';
beforeEach(() => {
const mockConfig = {
get: vi.fn((key: string, defaultValue?: string) => {
const env: Record<string, string> = {
'ZALOPAY_APP_ID': '2553',
'ZALOPAY_KEY1': 'TESTKEY1ABCDEF1234567890ABCDEF12',
'ZALOPAY_KEY2': 'TESTKEY2ABCDEF1234567890ABCDEF12',
};
return env[key] ?? defaultValue;
}),
getOrThrow: vi.fn((key: string) => {
// ...
}),
} as unknown as ConfigService;
const mockLogger = { log: vi.fn(), warn: vi.fn(), error: vi.fn(), debug: vi.fn(), verbose: vi.fn() };
service = new ZalopayService(mockConfig, mockLogger as any);
});
function buildCallbackData(
dataPayload: Record<string, unknown> = {},
tamperMac = false,
): Record<string, string> {
const payload = {
app_id: 2553,
app_trans_id: '260408_order-123',
zp_trans_id: 'ZLP_TX_456',
...dataPayload,
};
const dataStr = JSON.stringify(payload);
let mac = crypto
.createHmac('sha256', key2)
.update(dataStr)
.digest('hex');
if (tamperMac) {
mac = 'a'.repeat(mac.length);
}
return { data: dataStr, mac };
}
it('should verify a valid callback with timingSafeEqual', () => {
const data = buildCallbackData();
const result = service.verifyCallback(data);
expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
expect(result.isSuccess).toBe(true);
expect(result.orderId).toBe('260408_order-123');
expect(result.providerTxId).toBe('ZLP_TX_456');
});
it('should reject an invalid MAC', () => {
const data = buildCallbackData({}, true);
const result = service.verifyCallback(data);
expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
});
it('should handle invalid JSON in data field gracefully', () => {
const mac = crypto
.createHmac('sha256', key2)
.update('not-json')
.digest('hex');
const result = service.verifyCallback({ data: 'not-json', mac });
expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
});
});
```
**Key Takeaways**:
- ✅ Explicit vitest imports (import from 'vitest')
- ✅ Tests for security-critical functionality (HMAC verification)
- ✅ ConfigService mocking for environment variables
- ✅ Helper function for complex test data generation
- ✅ Tests for error conditions (invalid JSON, wrong MAC)
- ✅ Tests for security edge cases (tampered data)
- ✅ Uses Node.js crypto module directly
- ✅ Real algorithm testing (SHA256 HMAC)
---
## 6. TESTING CONVENTIONS SUMMARY
### Framework & Setup
- **Framework**: Vitest
- **Environment**: Node.js
- **Globals**: Enabled (`globals: true` in config)
- **File Pattern**: `*.spec.ts` (not `.test.ts`)
- **Test Organization**: `__tests__/` subdirectory
### Import Styles
```typescript
// Style 1: Using globals (in simple tests)
describe('MyClass', () => {
it('does something', () => {
expect(true).toBe(true);
});
});
// Style 2: Explicit imports (in complex/domain tests)
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest';
```
### Mocking Patterns
1. **Service Mocks**
```typescript
mockService = {
method: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(value),
method2: vi.fn().mockReturnValue(value),
};
```
2. **Module Mocks**
```typescript
vi.mock('@goodgo/mcp-servers', () => ({
SSEServerTransport: class MockSSE { /* ... */ },
}));
```
3. **Configuration Mocks**
```typescript
const mockConfig = {
get: vi.fn((key) => env[key]),
getOrThrow: vi.fn((key) => env[key] || throw),
};
```
### Test Structure
```typescript
describe('ClassName', () => {
let instance: ClassName;
let mockDep1: Mock;
let mockDep2: Mock;
beforeEach(() => {
// Setup mocks
mockDep1 = { method: vi.fn() };
// Instantiate with mocks
instance = new ClassName(mockDep1 as any, mockDep2 as any);
});
describe('methodName', () => {
it('happy path scenario', async () => {
// Arrange
mockDep1.method.mockResolvedValue(expected);
// Act
const result = await instance.method();
// Assert
expect(result).toEqual(expected);
expect(mockDep1.method).toHaveBeenCalledWith(params);
});
it('error case', async () => {
// Arrange
mockDep1.method.mockRejectedValue(new Error('fail'));
// Act & Assert
await expect(instance.method()).rejects.toThrow('fail');
});
});
});
```
### Common Assertions Used
- `expect(x).toBe(value)` - strict equality
- `expect(x).toEqual(object)` - deep equality
- `expect(x).toHaveLength(n)` - array/string length
- `expect(x).toBeInstanceOf(Class)` - instance check
- `expect(fn).toHaveBeenCalled()` - called verification
- `expect(fn).toHaveBeenCalledWith(args)` - call arguments
- `expect(fn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(n)` - call count
- `expect(promise).rejects.toThrow(msg)` - error expectation
### Vitest-Specific Features Used
- `vi.fn()` - create mock function
- `vi.mock()` - module mocking
- `mockResolvedValue()` - async return
- `mockReturnValue()` - sync return
- `mockRejectedValue()` - error simulation
- `Reflect.getMetadata()` - decorator inspection (NestJS)
---
## 7. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MCP MODULE TESTING
### Current Coverage Status
- ✅ Controller (presentation layer): Well tested
- ⚠️ Module initialization: Basic (mocked)
- ❌ Domain layer: Not implemented
- ❌ Application layer: Not implemented
- ❌ Infrastructure layer: Not implemented
### Recommended Next Steps
1. **Expand Controller Tests**
- Integration tests with mock SSE connections
- Test session lifecycle (open → message → close)
- Test error recovery
2. **Add Module Tests**
- Test `McpIntegrationModule.onModuleInit()`
- Test registry initialization
- Test service injection
3. **Consider Adding Domain Tests** (if business logic added)
- Session entity tests
- Connection state management
- Event handling
### Test Command
```bash
# Run all MCP tests
pnpm test -- src/modules/mcp
# Run with coverage
pnpm test -- --coverage src/modules/mcp
# Watch mode
pnpm test -- --watch src/modules/mcp
```